I have been fortunate enough to have worked with email through many of its phases of evolution. From Host-based systems such as BITNET, IBM’s 8100, S/36, Profs, Officevision, DEC All-in-One, Wang Mail, to LAN-based systems such as cc:mail, IBM Workgroup, Banyan Vines, and Lotus Notes. And integrated these systems with software such as IBM’s DISOSS and Softswitch and proceeded on to the early days of SMTP connectivity.
Many of the systems listed above have gone to the great IT graveyard in the sky. New technology is being developed in minutes rather than hours/days/weeks/years. And based on my own personal experience, whenever an article included the tolling of the death knell of a product, or the introduction of new technology – the reaction of management and users almost always follow Küber-Ross’s model of denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance. And after reading again the posts that stirred up “Notes is dead” again, it occurred to me that the authors are speaking not to the client software itself as much as the development tools that enable they and other developers to create applications that run on Domino servers. Look at any list of new programming languages. Why wouldn’t it be IBM’s strategy to incorporate these new technologies? They surely will work to do as long as they want Notes/Domino and Domino related products to be a viable option in the marketplace.
And finally to sum, I paraphrase the great Gershwin song…“Potato, potahto, tomato, tomahto, let’s call the whole thing off…”
The Space Used column has returned as an option in the Files preferences in the Admin client. It’s currently available in the 8.5.2 CD4 beta client. I and a number of other administrators missed this option when it was pulled from an earlier version of 8.5. Here’s hoping it will be included when 8.5.2 goes gold!
We as Domino Administrators love our users? Right? Of course we do! Okay maybe not so much. But with 8.5.2 if this option goes to gold, we might at least receive fewer phone calls! How many of you have received the phone call when a user sees the popup dialog that the server is not responding and that they should select their cluster server? Or better yet that they just get the error message that the server is not responding? In the CD4 version of the 8.5.2 Beta a dynamic desktop policy setting is currently included to allow “silent” failover when the server goes down.
Now I don’t know about you, but I’m all about the users not being required to respond to a user prompt. Because more than likely if they should respond, they will not!
Another setting I’m in favor of is the “Enable upgrade of all local NSFs to latest ODS version.” This is especially useful if you are trying to standardize your users’ desktops or resolve a problem that you may think is related to the current ODS version.
I would however, like to see some additional development in the area of policy administration. Perhaps a method for testing policies prior to application, and certainly some improved methods for determining when and what has been applied. Policies and settings are powerful tools, but at this point they’re still more like chain saws when what you really want to wield is a scalpel!